The 5-year case is a platform-style multiple defended by energy scaling and recurring network/software services, with autonomy and robotics as upside. The main risk is a multiple reset if EVs commoditize faster than Tesla’s services layer grows.

Tesla’s 2031 upside is defending a premium multiple by shifting profit pools from cyclical EV margins to higher-frequency, trust-based software + network services while scaling grid storage; autonomy and robotics remain call options that can add non-linear revenue if safety/regulatory gates clear.

Physical distribution (fleet + chargers + energy assets) plus software updates lets Tesla monetize attention, trust, and prediction loops—if it converts them into recurring services.

Tesla’s near-term auto business looks more OEM-like (price competition, incentive volatility), but its non-linear path is building a high-trust operating system across vehicles + charging + grid assets. Compared with BYDDF and GM (hardware volume, lower multiples) and MBLY (software leverage but no physical network), Tesla’s advantage is distribution to an installed base plus infrastructure rails. If Energy keeps scaling and Tesla layers software monetization (charging settlement, fleet ops, insurance risk pricing, factory software), the market can keep valuing the company closer to a platform than a carmaker—without requiring a fully global robotaxi outcome by 2031.

The core risk is a timing mismatch: EV profitability is cyclic and competitive, while Tesla must keep funding AI/compute, new vehicle programs, and energy capacity. If autonomy monetization remains gated and energy/services don’t grow fast enough to offset weaker auto margins, the market can re-rate Tesla toward an industrial multiple before the new profit pools are large enough to defend a premium.

Slight de-risking after weak FY2025 delivery trend; offset by strong energy deployments and continued infrastructure/network optionality.

$408.54