INOD is priced like a premium AI data-ops specialist, not a generic outsourcer. The 5-year upside is primarily revenue-driven: (1) larger, more frequent refresh/evaluation cycles as models ship into production, (2) mix-shift toward higher-assurance, compliance-heavy work where failures are expensive, and (3) modest platformization (measurement + provenance) that reduces pure labor substitutability. The
multiple assumption is conservative vs today because automation/in-sourcing should compress services valuation unless INOD proves durable, embedded programs and diversification.